Attorney Grievance v. Walton
This text of 466 Md. 304 (Attorney Grievance v. Walton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND * * Misc. Docket AG No. 0011 v. * * September Term, 2019 CHARLES EARL WALTON *
ORDER
UPON CONSIDERATION of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance
Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Charles Earl Walton, to reprimand the
Respondent for violations of Rules 1.3, 1.4, and 8.4(d) of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules
of Professional Conduct, it is this 21st day of October 2019
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Charles
Earl Walton, be reprimanded for violating Rules 1.3, 1.4, and 8.4(d) of the Maryland Rules
of Professional Conduct.
/s/ Robert N. McDonald Senior Judge
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2019-10-21 15:34-04:00
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
466 Md. 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-walton-md-2019.