Attorney Grievance v. Tun
This text of 288 A.3d 1235 (Attorney Grievance v. Tun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * Misc. AG Docket No. 47 HARRY TUN * September Term, 2022 * ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed by
Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, and Respondent, Harry
Tun, on January 23, 2023, in which the parties advise that by an opinion filed
December 22, 2022, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals disbarred the
Respondent for violations of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct
3.3(a)(1) and 8.4(b), (c), and (d), and the parties agree that the Respondent engaged
in misconduct that violates the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct
set forth above and the Respondent consents to disbarment as the appropriate
sanction, it is this 24th day of January 2023,
ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that, effective immediately,
the Respondent, Harry Tun, is disbarred from the practice of law in the State of
Maryland for violation of Rules 3.3(a)(1) and 8.4(b), (c), and (d) of the Maryland
Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Harry Tun from
the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client
Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this
State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761(b); and it is further ORDERED that the Show Cause Order issued on January 10, 2023, directing
the parties to show cause why corresponding discipline should not be imposed on the
Respondent is satisfied.
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. /s/ Shirley M. Watts Senior Justice 2023-01-24 08:32-05:00
Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
288 A.3d 1235, 482 Md. 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-tun-md-2023.