Attorney Grievance v. Tan
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Tan (Attorney Grievance v. Tan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION IN THE OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS 200 Harry S. Truman Pkwy, Suite 300 OF MARYLAND Annapolis, MD 21401
Petitioner, Misc. Docket AG V. No. 39 Jing Tan, Esquire September Term, 2016
Respondent. ORDER
This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Joint Consent Motion for
Suspension, it is this 22nd day of September ,2016,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-
737, that Respondent Jing Tan, Esquire, is hereby suspended from the practice of law in
Maryland for sixty (60) days based on her misconduct involving the former Maryland Lawyers'
Rules of Professional Conduct (MLRPC) 1.1, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6(a), 1.15(a), 7.1(a) and 8.4(a) and (d).
/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Tan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-tan-md-2016.