Attorney Grievance v. Sweitzer
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Sweitzer (Attorney Grievance v. Sweitzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * * COURT OF APPEALS Petitioner * * OF MARYLAND * v. * Misc. Docket AG * PHILIP JAMES SWEITZER * No. 11 * * September Term, 2014 Respondent * * ***************************************************
ORDER
This matter, having come before the Court upon the filing of a Petition for Disciplinary or
Remedial Action pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-771(b), with attached certified copy of a
judgment of conviction entered against Philip James Sweitzer in the Circuit Court for Howard
County; and it appearing that the criminal conviction is for a “serious crime” as defined in
Maryland Rule 16-701(k); and it appearing that Philip James Sweitzer is admitted to the Bar of
this Court, it is, this 22nd day of September, 2014,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Philip James
Sweitzer, be, and he is hereby suspended, effective immediately, from the practice of law in the
State of Maryland, pending further order of this Court, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-771(c); and
it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Philip James Sweitzer
from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-760(e), shall certify that fact to
the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.
/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Sweitzer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-sweitzer-md-2014.