Attorney Grievance v. Sud
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMIS SION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * * COURT OF APPEALS
*
* OF MARYLAND
Petitioner * * Misc. Docket AG
v. * * No. 62
ANUJ SUD * September Term,2017
*
*
*
Respondent * *********************** ORDER
The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having considered the Joint Petition for
Disbarment by Consent filed by Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of
Maryland, and Respondent, Anuj Sud, it is the 8th _,day of February 201 8;
ORDERED, that Anuj Sud, be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately,
from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland for violating Maryland Lawyers'
Rules of Professional Conduct 8.4(b) and (d); and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Anuj Sud from the
register of attomeys and, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-761, shall certifu the fact to the
Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.
/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Attorney Grievance v. Sud (Attorney Grievance v. Sud) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.