Attorney Grievance v. Sud

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided February 8, 2018·No. 62ag/17·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMIS SION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * * COURT OF APPEALS

*

* OF MARYLAND

Petitioner * * Misc. Docket AG

v. * * No. 62

ANUJ SUD * September Term,2017

*

*

*

Respondent * *********************** ORDER

The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having considered the Joint Petition for

Disbarment by Consent filed by Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of

Maryland, and Respondent, Anuj Sud, it is the 8th _,day of February 201 8;

ORDERED, that Anuj Sud, be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately,

from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland for violating Maryland Lawyers'

Rules of Professional Conduct 8.4(b) and (d); and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Anuj Sud from the

register of attomeys and, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-761, shall certifu the fact to the

Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance v. Sud, (Md. 2018).

Attorney Grievance v. Sud (Attorney Grievance v. Sud) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.