Attorney Grievance v. Stuart

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJune 30, 2017
Docket18ag/17
StatusPublished

This text of Attorney Grievance v. Stuart (Attorney Grievance v. Stuart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. Stuart, (Md. 2017).

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION • IN THE OF MARYLAND • COURT OF APPEALS • OF MARYLAND Petitioner • Misc. Docket AG v. • No. 18 PAMELA BRUCE STUART • September Term, 2017 Respondent

***********************************************

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Petition for Disciplinary or

Remedial Action, with attached certified copy of an Order entered January 5, 2017, whereby the

Supreme Court of Florida suspended Pamela Bruce Stuart from the practice of law in Florida for

one year, effective thirty days from the date of the Order; and it appearing that said Pamela

Bruce Stuart is admitted to the Bar of this Court;

NOW, THEREFORE, it is this 30th day of June ,20I7,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-

737(d), that Pamela Bruce Stuart, Respondent, is hereby suspended, effective immediately, from

the practice of law in the State of Maryland, pending further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Pamela Bruce Stuart

from the register of attorneys in this Court and comply with the notice provisions of Maryland

Rule 19-761(b):

Is/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Attorney Grievance v. Stuart, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-stuart-md-2017.