Attorney Grievance v. Stuart
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Stuart (Attorney Grievance v. Stuart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION • IN THE OF MARYLAND • COURT OF APPEALS • OF MARYLAND Petitioner • Misc. Docket AG v. • No. 18 PAMELA BRUCE STUART • September Term, 2017 Respondent
***********************************************
ORDER
This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Petition for Disciplinary or
Remedial Action, with attached certified copy of an Order entered January 5, 2017, whereby the
Supreme Court of Florida suspended Pamela Bruce Stuart from the practice of law in Florida for
one year, effective thirty days from the date of the Order; and it appearing that said Pamela
Bruce Stuart is admitted to the Bar of this Court;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is this 30th day of June ,20I7,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-
737(d), that Pamela Bruce Stuart, Respondent, is hereby suspended, effective immediately, from
the practice of law in the State of Maryland, pending further order of this Court; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Pamela Bruce Stuart
from the register of attorneys in this Court and comply with the notice provisions of Maryland
Rule 19-761(b):
Is/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Stuart, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-stuart-md-2017.