Attorney Grievance v. Silber
This text of 467 Md. 429 (Attorney Grievance v. Silber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS
v. * OF MARYLAND
* Misc. Docket AG No. 66, LEWIS MAURICE SILBER * September Term, 2019
ORDER
WHEREAS, the parties have filed an Amended Joint Petition for Disbarment by
Consent pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736;
WHEREAS, in the Amended Joint Petition, Respondent Lewis Maurice Silber
admits that, if a hearing were held, there would be sufficient evidence to prove that he
misappropriated client and third-party funds and thereby violated Rules 1.15(a) and (d),
and 8.4(c) and (d) of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct;
WHEREAS, in the Amended Joint Petition, Mr. Silber contends that the
misappropriation was unintentional and the result of poor accounting practices, but
nonetheless acknowledges that there is a sufficient factual basis for concluding that he
violated Rule 8.4(c) (dishonesty);
WHEREAS, this Court has not recognized negligent misappropriation as a basis
for finding a violation of Rule 8.4(c) and therefore understands Mr. Silber to be
acknowledging that there is sufficient evidence to prove intentional misappropriation in
violation of Rule 8.4(c); WHEREAS, upon consideration of the Amended Joint Petition, it is this 28th day
of February, 2020,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Lewis
Maurice Silber, be, and hereby is, disbarred from the practice of law in the State of
Maryland, and it is further
ORDERED, that the disbarment of Respondent shall not become effective until 120
days from the date of this Order, so long as Respondent complies with the Monitoring
Agreement attached to the Amended Joint Petition; and it is further
ORDERED, that upon the date of disbarment, the Clerk of this Court shall remove
the name of Lewis Maurice Silber from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify
that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks
of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-736(d).
/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2020-02-28 12:06-05:00
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
467 Md. 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-silber-md-2020.