Attorney Grievance v. Siegel

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided January 3, 2018·No. 56ag/17·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMIS SION IN TTM OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND

Petitioner, Misc. Docket AG

v. No.-56 September Term,2017

STACY ENID LEBOW SIEGEL

Respondent.

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Affomey Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Stacy Enid LeBow Siegel, to disbar the Respondent from the practice of law for violations of Rules 1.15 (a) and (c) and 8.4(c) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct. The Court having considered the Petition, and the record herein, it is this 3rd day of January 2018;

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Stacy Enid LeBow Siegel, be and she is hereby disbaned from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective sixty (60) days from the entry of this Order, and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Stacy Enid LeBow Siegel from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule I9-742.

/s/ Clayton Greene Jr.

Senior Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance v. Siegel, (Md. 2018).

Attorney Grievance v. Siegel (Attorney Grievance v. Siegel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.