Attorney Grievance v. Siegel
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Siegel (Attorney Grievance v. Siegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMIS SION IN TTM OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Petitioner, Misc. Docket AG v. No.-56 September Term,2017 STACY ENID LEBOW SIEGEL
Respondent.
ORDER
This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Affomey Grievance
Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Stacy Enid LeBow Siegel, to disbar the
Respondent from the practice of law for violations of Rules 1.15 (a) and (c) and 8.4(c)
and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct. The Court having
considered the Petition, and the record herein, it is this 3rd day of January
2018;
ORDERED, that the Respondent, Stacy Enid LeBow Siegel, be and she is hereby
disbaned from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective sixty (60) days from
the entry of this Order, and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Stacy Enid
LeBow Siegel from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the
Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all clerks of all judicial
tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule I9-742.
/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Siegel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-siegel-md-2018.