Attorney Grievance v. Siegel

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJanuary 3, 2018
Docket56ag/17
StatusPublished

This text of Attorney Grievance v. Siegel (Attorney Grievance v. Siegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. Siegel, (Md. 2018).

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMIS SION IN TTM OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Petitioner, Misc. Docket AG v. No.-56 September Term,2017 STACY ENID LEBOW SIEGEL

Respondent.

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Affomey Grievance

Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Stacy Enid LeBow Siegel, to disbar the

Respondent from the practice of law for violations of Rules 1.15 (a) and (c) and 8.4(c)

and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct. The Court having

considered the Petition, and the record herein, it is this 3rd day of January

2018;

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Stacy Enid LeBow Siegel, be and she is hereby

disbaned from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective sixty (60) days from

the entry of this Order, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Stacy Enid

LeBow Siegel from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the

Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all clerks of all judicial

tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule I9-742.

/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Attorney Grievance v. Siegel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-siegel-md-2018.