Attorney Grievance v. Seward
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Seward (Attorney Grievance v. Seward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * * COURT OF APPEALS Petitioner, * * OF MARYLAND v. * * JAMIE BLUM SEWARD * Misc. Docket AG No. 107 * September Term, 2013 Respondent. * * *
ORDER
This Court having considered the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent,
with Right to Apply for Reinstatement After Ninety (90) Days, filed herein pursuant to Maryland
Rule 16-772, it is this 2nd day of April, 2014,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Jamie Blum Seward be, and she
hereby is, indefinitely suspended, effective immediately, by consent from the practice of law in
the State of Maryland, and it is further
ORDERED, that the Respondent may apply for reinstatement after ninety (90) days from
the date this Order is entered, and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Jamie Blum Seward
from the register of attorneys in this Court, and shall certify that fact to the Client Protection
Fund of the Bar of Maryland and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State pursuant to
Maryland Rule 16-772(d).
/s/ Glenn T. Harrell, Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Seward, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-seward-md-2014.