Attorney Grievance v. Schuman

254 A.3d 446, 474 Md. 236
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJuly 8, 2021
Docket13ag/21
StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.3d 446 (Attorney Grievance v. Schuman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. Schuman, 254 A.3d 446, 474 Md. 236 (Md. 2021).

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS

* OF MARYLAND v. * Misc. Docket AG No. 13

JONATHAN ROBERT SCHUMAN * September Term, 2021

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action, with

attached certified copy of an Opinion entered June 10, 2021, whereby the District of

Columbia Court of Appeals disbarred Jonathan Robert Schuman from the practice of law

in the District of Columbia; and it appearing that Jonathan Robert Schuman is admitted to

the Bar of this Court, it is this 8th day of July, 2021

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, in accordance with Maryland

Rule 19-737(d), that Jonathan Robert Schuman, Respondent, is hereby temporarily

suspended, effective immediately, from the practice of law in the State of Maryland,

pending further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Jonathan Robert

Schuman from the register of attorneys in this Court and comply with the notice provisions

of Maryland Rule 19-761.

Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal /s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. Chief Judge 2021-07-08 16:26-04:00

Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.3d 446, 474 Md. 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-schuman-md-2021.