Attorney Grievance v. Sayadian

275 A.3d 353, 478 Md. 525
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMay 10, 2022
Docket4ag/21
StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.3d 353 (Attorney Grievance v. Sayadian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. Sayadian, 275 A.3d 353, 478 Md. 525 (Md. 2022).

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS

* OF MARYLAND v. * Misc. Docket AG No. 4 September Term, 2021 NEMA SAYADIAN * (No. 485176V, Circuit Court * for Montgomery County) ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of

Maryland and the Respondent, Nema Sayadian, to suspend the Respondent from the practice

of law in Maryland for 60 days, stayed in favor of two years of probation with terms, for

violation of Rules 19-301.8(a), 19-307.3(a), 19-308.1(b), and 19-308.4(a) and (d) of the

Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, it is this 10th day of May, 2022

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Nema

Sayadian, be suspended for 60 days from the practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it

is further

ORDERED, that, the suspension be, and hereby is, STAYED in favor of two years of

probation with the terms contained in the Probation Agreement.

Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act /s/ Matthew J. Fader (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

Chief Judge 2022-05-10 08:19-04:00

Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 A.3d 353, 478 Md. 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-sayadian-md-2022.