Attorney Grievance v. Russell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance v. Russell

DecidedFebruary 27, 2014

Docket58ag/13

StatusPublished

This text of Attorney Grievance v. Russell (Attorney Grievance v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance v. Russell, (Md. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND Petitioner * * Misc. Docket AG v. * No. 58 * September Term, 2013 SUSAN WHITTINGTON RUSSELL * * Circuit Court for Respondent * Anne Arundel County *

Case No. O2-C-l3-l83404

* ***********************************************

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Joint Petition for Reprimand By Consent, and the Court having considered same,

NOW, THEREFORE, it is this 27th day of February , 2014,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Susan Whitting“con Russell, Respondent in the captioned disciplinary proceeding, is hereby reprimanded for engaging in professional misconduct that violated Rule 8.4(d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of

Professional Conduct.

/s/ Glenn T. Harrell, Jr. Senior Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI