Attorney Grievance v. Ross

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJanuary 13, 2017
Docket81ag/16
StatusPublished

This text of Attorney Grievance v. Ross (Attorney Grievance v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. Ross, (Md. 2017).

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION • IN THE OF MARYLAND • COURT OF APPEALS • OF MARYLAND

Petitioner • Misc. Docket AG V. • No. 81 BRANDON D. ROSS • September Term, 2016

Respondent

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on the presentation or a certified copy of the

Order of the New Hampshire Supreme Court dated September 19, 2016 wherein Brandon D. Ross

was disbarred from the practice of law in the State of New Hampshire; and it appearing that

Brandon D. Ross is also a member of the Bar of this Court; it is this 13th day of

January ,2017,

ORDERED by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, Brandon D. Ross,

be, and he is hereby, indefinitely suspended, effective immediately, from the further practice of

law in the State of Maryland, pending further order of this Court, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-

737(d); and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name Brandon D. Ross from the

register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rules 19-737(i) and 19-761(b) shall certify that

fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

/s/ Clayton Greene Jr Senior Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Attorney Grievance v. Ross, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-ross-md-2017.