Attorney Grievance v. Rosenberg
This text of 229 A.3d 801 (Attorney Grievance v. Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS
v. * OF MARYLAND
* Misc. Docket AG No. 105 MICHAEL THOMAS ROSENBERG * September Term, 2019
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of
Maryland and the Respondent, Michael Thomas Rosenberg, to place the Respondent on
Inactive Status by Consent pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736(c), it is this 22nd day of
June, 2020
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Joint Petition be, and it
is hereby GRANTED, and the Respondent, Michael Thomas Rosenberg, is hereby placed
on Inactive Status, and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Michael Thomas
Rosenberg from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Client
Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State
in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-736(d).
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document /s/ Robert N. McDonald is authentic. Suzanne Johnson Senior Judge 2020-06-22 15:20-04:00
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
229 A.3d 801, 469 Md. 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-rosenberg-md-2020.