Attorney Grievance v. Rogers
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Rogers (Attorney Grievance v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Petitioner Misc. Docket AG No. 104 V.
September Term, 2016
WILLIAM NORMAN ROGERS
Respondent.
ORDER
This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance
Commission of Maryland and Respondent, William Norman Rogers, to suspend the Respondent from
the practice of law for 90 days. The Court having considered the Petition and the record herein, it is
this 7th day of April , 2017, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland;
ORDERED, that Respondent, William Norman Rogers, be and he hereby is suspended from
the practice of law in the State of Maryland for 90 days for violation of Rules 4.2 and 8.4(d) of the
Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name William Norman Rogers from
the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection
Fund of the Bar of Maryland and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with
Maryland Rules 19-736(d) and 19-761.
/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Rogers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-rogers-md-2017.