Attorney Grievance v. Robinson
This text of 269 A.3d 323 (Attorney Grievance v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS
v. * OF MARYLAND
* Misc. Docket AG No. 58 STUART JAY ROBINSON * September Term, 2021
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of
Maryland and the Respondent, Stuart Jay Robinson, to transfer the Respondent to disability
inactive status, it is this 1st day of February, 2022
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Joint Petition be, and it
is hereby GRANTED, and the Respondent, Stuart Jay Robinson, is hereby transferred to
disability inactive status pending further order of this Court, and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Stuart Jay
Robinson from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Client
Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State
in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. /s/ Robert N. McDonald 2022-02-01 Senior Judge 11:49-05:00
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.3d 323, 477 Md. 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-robinson-md-2022.