Attorney Grievance v. Robertson
This text of 464 Md. 66 (Attorney Grievance v. Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND Petitioner, * v. Misc. Docket AG * No. 90 KATHRYN ALICIA ROBERTSON September Term, 2018 * Respondent.
ORDER
UPON CONSIDERATION of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance
Commission and Respondent, Kathryn Alicia Robertson, to place Respondent on Inactive
Status by Consent pursuant to Maryland Rules 19-736(c), it is this 20th day of June, 2019;
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Joint Petition be, and it
is hereby GRANTED, and the Respondent, Kathryn Alicia Robertson, is hereby placed on
Inactive Status by consent; and it is further,
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Kathryn Alicia
Robertson from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client
Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State
in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.
/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2019-06-20 14:12-04:00
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
464 Md. 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-robertson-md-2019.