Attorney Grievance v. Ring
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Ring (Attorney Grievance v. Ring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMIS SION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * * COURT OF APPEALS =l< * OF MARYLAND >k Petitioner * Misc. Docket AG >l¢ vs. * No. _1__1 6 >l< KEVIN ANTHONY RlNG * September Term, 2013 * =k >|< Respondent * ORDER
This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attomey Grievance Commissi0n of Maryland and Respondent, Kevin Anthony Ring, Esquire, to disbar the Respondent from the practice of law.
The Court having considered this Petition, it is this L$glday of May 2014.
ORDERED, that Respondent, Kevin Anthony Ring, be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland.
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Kevin Anthony Ring, from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with
Maryland Ruie 16-772(<1).
/s/ Glenn T. Harrel1, Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Ring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-ring-md-2014.