Attorney Grievance v. Resnick
This text of 247 A.3d 336 (Attorney Grievance v. Resnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS
v. * OF MARYLAND
* Misc. Docket AG No. 76 PERRY ANDREW RESNICK * September Term, 2020
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of
Maryland and the Respondent, Perry Andrew Resnick, to place the Respondent on Inactive
Status by Consent pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736(c), it is this 9th day of March, 2021
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Joint Petition be, and it
is hereby GRANTED, and the Respondent, Perry Andrew Resnick, is hereby placed on
Inactive Status for an indefinite period of time, and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Perry Andrew
Resnick from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Client
Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State
in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.
/s/ Robert N. McDonald Senior Judge Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2021-03-09 14:15-05:00
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 A.3d 336, 472 Md. 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-resnick-md-2021.