Attorney Grievance v. Reed
This text of 466 Md. 308 (Attorney Grievance v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND * v. * * Misc. Docket AG * No. 47 JAMES KEVIN REED * September Term, 2019
ORDER
UPON CONSIDERATION of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed
pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736 by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland
and the Respondent, James Kevin Reed, wherein the Respondent acknowledges that
sufficient evidence exists to establish he violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of
Professional Conduct (MARPC) 1.4 (Md. Rule 19-301.4), 1.15(a) & (d) (Md. Rule 19-
301.15), 8.1(a) & (b) (Md. Rule 19-308.1) and 8.4(a)(b)(c) & (d) (Md. Rule 19-308.4),
Maryland Rules 19-407(a) and 19-410, and § 10-306 of the Business Occupations and
Professions Article of the Maryland Code, it is this 24th day of October, 2019,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that James Kevin Reed, is hereby
disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective immediately; and it
is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of James Kevin Reed
from the register of attorneys in this Court, notify the Respondent of such action, and
comply with the notice provisions of Maryland Rule 19-761(b).
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. /s/ Robert N. McDonald 2019-10-24 10:38-04:00 Senior Judge
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
466 Md. 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-reed-md-2019.