Attorney Grievance v. Praley
This text of 270 A.3d 353 (Attorney Grievance v. Praley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS
* OF MARYLAND v. * Misc. Docket AG No. 8 September Term, 2021 JAMES CHARLES PRALEY * (No. C-02-CV-21-000788, * Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County)
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand filed by the Attorney
Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, James Charles Praley, it is this 18th
day of February, 2022
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the of the Court
concurring, that the Respondent, James Charles Praley, be, and he hereby is,
REPRIMANDED for violating Rules 19-301.1, 19-301.3, 19-301.4(a) and (b), and 19-
308.4(a) of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct.
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2022-02-18 08:44-05:00 /s/ Joseph M. Getty Chief Judge
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 A.3d 353, 477 Md. 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-praley-md-2022.