Attorney Grievance v. Powell
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Powell (Attorney Grievance v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case No. 24-C-17-003207 Argued: June 1, 2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF MARYLAND
Misc. Docket AG No. 9 September Term, 2017
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION
v.
ROGER NORMAN POWELL
Barbera, C.J. Greene Adkins McDonald Watts Hotten Getty,
JJ.
PER CURIAM ORDER
Filed: June 1, 2018 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * In the COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * Court of Appeals
v. * of Maryland
ROGER NORMAN POWELL * Misc. Docket AG No. 9 September Term, 2017
For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it
is this 1st day of June 2018,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the
Respondent, Roger Norman Powell be, and he is hereby, disbarred,
effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State
of Maryland; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of
Roger Norman Powell from the register of attorneys, and pursuant
to Maryland Rule 19-761, shall certify that fact to the Trustees
of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals
in the State; and it is further
ORDERED that Respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the
Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant
to Maryland Rule 19-709, for which sum judgment is entered in favor
of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Roger Norman
Powell.
/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Powell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-powell-md-2018.