Attorney Grievance v. Plimpton
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Plimpton (Attorney Grievance v. Plimpton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE
OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND i Petitioner,- . * Misc. Docket AG No. 151 i v, I'l * September Term, 2014
.I THOMAS WILLIAM PLIMPTON
Respondent. ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant l
...—_._
i I I l l g to Maryland Rule 16-722, in which Respondent admits he committed professional misconduct in i !
violation of Rules 8.4(a), 8.4(b), 8.4(c) and 8.4(d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of
Professional Conduct, it is this 18Eh day of December , 2014,
l ORDERED, that Respondent, Thomas W. Plimpton, be and he is hereby disbarred from I
I i the practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further i ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Thomas William
1 I Plimpton from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the
I Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State
, in accordance with Maryland Rule l6-772(d). i
_7/§/_Glenn T. Harrell, Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Plimpton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-plimpton-md-2014.