Attorney Grievance v. Planta

466 Md. 434
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedDecember 6, 2019
Docket62agpc/18
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 466 Md. 434 (Attorney Grievance v. Planta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. Planta, 466 Md. 434 (Md. 2019).

Opinion

Circuit Court for Montgomery County Case No. 463779-V Argued: December 5, 2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

OF MARYLAND

Misc. Docket AG No. 62 September Term, 2018

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

v.

WILLIAM CLARK PLANTA

Barbera, C.J. McDonald Watts Hotten Getty Booth Battaglia, Lynne A., (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned)

JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

Filed: December 6, 2019

Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2019-12-06 13:38-05:00

Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * In the COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * Court of Appeals

v. * of Maryland

WILLIAM CLARK PLANTA * Misc. Docket AG No. 62 September Term, 2018

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 6th day of

December 2019,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, William

Clark Planta be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further

practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of William Clark

Planta from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-761, shall certify

that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial

tribunals in the State; and it is further

ORDERED that Respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court,

including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-709, for which sum

judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against

William Clark Planta.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attorney Grievance v. Planta
225 A.3d 19 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 Md. 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-planta-md-2019.