Attorney Grievance v. Patel
This text of 251 A.3d 316 (Attorney Grievance v. Patel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS
* OF MARYLAND v. * Misc. Docket AG No. 75 September Term, 2020 NISHITH PATEL * (No. 484952-C, Circuit * Court for Montgomery County)
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed by the
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Nishith Patel, it is this
14th day of May, 2021
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Nishith Patel,
be, and he hereby is, REPRIMANDED for violating Rules 1.4, 1.7, 1.15, 8.1(b), and 8.4(d)
of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.
/s/ Robert N. McDonald Senior Judge
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2021-05-14 10:29-04:00
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.3d 316, 473 Md. 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-patel-md-2021.