Attorney Grievance v. Nabit

251 A.3d 315, 473 Md. 458
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMay 12, 2021
Docket92ag/20
StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.3d 315 (Attorney Grievance v. Nabit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. Nabit, 251 A.3d 315, 473 Md. 458 (Md. 2021).

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS

v. * OF MARYLAND

* Misc. Docket AG No. 92

CHARLES JOHN NABIT * September Term, 2020

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of

Maryland and the Respondent, Charles John Nabit, to disbar the Respondent from the

practice of law, it is this 12th day of May, 2021

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Charles John

Nabit, be, and hereby is, disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for

violation of Rules 8.4(a), (b), (c) and (d) of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional

Conduct; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Charles John Nabit

from the register of attorneys in this Court, and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client

Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in

accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.

/s/ Robert N. McDonald Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act Senior Judge (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2021-05-12 10:52-04:00

Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.3d 315, 473 Md. 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-nabit-md-2021.