Attorney Grievance v. Murray

227 A.3d 1137, 468 Md. 541
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMay 8, 2020
Docket90ag/19
StatusPublished

This text of 227 A.3d 1137 (Attorney Grievance v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. Murray, 227 A.3d 1137, 468 Md. 541 (Md. 2020).

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS

* OF MARYLAND v. * Misc. Docket AG No. 90

CHARLES ALEX MURRAY * September Term, 2019

ORDER Upon consideration of the Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action filed by the

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, with attached certified copy of an Order

entered May 30, 2019, whereby the Supreme Court of Florida suspended Charles Alex

Murray from the practice of law in Florida for 180 days, effective thirty (30) days from the

date of the order, and with attached certified copy of an Order entered December 19, 2019,

whereby the District of Columbia suspended Charles Alex Murray from the practice of law

in the District of Columbia for 180 days with reinstatement contingent on a showing of

fitness, and it appearing that Respondent, Charles Alex Murray, is admitted to the Bar of

this Court, it is this 8th day of May, 2020;

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, in accordance with Maryland

Rule 19-737(d), that the Respondent, Charles Alex Murray, be, and he hereby is,

suspended, effective immediately, from the practice of law in the State of Maryland,

pending further Order of this Court; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Charles Alex

Murray from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the trustees of the

Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this

State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761(b).

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge

Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

Suzanne Johnson 2020-05-08 14:39-04:00

Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 A.3d 1137, 468 Md. 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-murray-md-2020.