Attorney Grievance v. Murphy
This text of 241 A.3d 315 (Attorney Grievance v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS
v. * OF MARYLAND
* Misc. Docket AG No. 13 September Term, 2020 * TIMOTHY J. MURPHY (No. C-08-CV-20-000373, * Circuit Court for Charles County) ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed by the
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Timothy J. Murphy, it is
this 4th day of November, 2020
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that effective January 1, 2021,
the Respondent, Timothy J. Murphy, be disbarred from the practice of law in the State of
Maryland for violation of Rules 1.1 (competence), 1.3 (diligence), 1.4 (communication), 1.5
(fees), 1.15 (safekeeping property), 1.16 (declining or terminating representation), 8.1 (bar
admission and disciplinary matters), and 8.4 (a), (c), and (d) (misconduct) of the Maryland
Rules of Professional Conduct, and it is further
ORDERED, that, on January 1, 2021, the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of
Timothy J. Murphy from the register of attorneys in this Court, and certify that fact to the
Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial
tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761. Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2020-11-04 10:23-05:00 /s/ Robert N. McDonald Senior Judge
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.3d 315, 471 Md. 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-murphy-md-2020.