Attorney Grievance v. Moshman
This text of 275 A.3d 345 (Attorney Grievance v. Moshman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS
* OF MARYLAND v. * Misc. Docket AG No. 84
RACHAEL ALEXANDRA SCHMID MOSHMAN * September Term, 2021
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of
Maryland and the Respondent, Rachael Alexandra Schmid Moshman, to suspend the
Respondent from the practice of law in Maryland for seven months with 30 days stayed in
favor of one year of probation with terms, it is this 9th day of May, 2022
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Rachael
Alexandra Schmid Moshman, be, and hereby is, suspended from the practice of law in the
State of Maryland for seven months for violation of Rules 1.1(a), 1.3(c), and 1.15(a) of the
District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further
ORDERED, that 30 days of the suspension be, and hereby is STAYED; and it is further
ORDERED, that upon her reinstatement to practice law in the State of Maryland, the
Respondent is placed on one year of probation with the terms contained in the Probation
Agreement. Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2022-05-09 /s/ Matthew J. Fader 12:09-04:00 Chief Judge
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 A.3d 345, 478 Md. 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-moshman-md-2022.