Attorney Grievance v. Moshman

275 A.3d 345, 478 Md. 509
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 9, 2022·No. 84ag/21·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS

* OF MARYLAND

v.

* Misc. Docket AG No. 84

RACHAEL ALEXANDRA SCHMID MOSHMAN * September Term, 2021

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Rachael Alexandra Schmid Moshman, to suspend the Respondent from the practice of law in Maryland for seven months with 30 days stayed in favor of one year of probation with terms, it is this 9th day of May, 2022

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Rachael Alexandra Schmid Moshman, be, and hereby is, suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for seven months for violation of Rules 1.1(a), 1.3(c), and 1.15(a) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further

ORDERED, that 30 days of the suspension be, and hereby is STAYED; and it is further

ORDERED, that upon her reinstatement to practice law in the State of Maryland, the Respondent is placed on one year of probation with the terms contained in the Probation

Agreement. Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2022-05-09 /s/ Matthew J. Fader 12:09-04:00

Chief Judge

Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance v. Moshman, 275 A.3d 345, 478 Md. 509 (Md. 2022).

275 A.3d 345 (Attorney Grievance v. Moshman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elsberry v. Stanley Martin Companies
286 A.3d 1 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2022)