Attorney Grievance v. Moody
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Moody (Attorney Grievance v. Moody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Circuit Court for Baltimore County Case No. 03-C-16-010220 Argued: September 12, 2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF MARYLAND
Misc. Docket AG No. 38 September Term, 2016
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION
v.
MAURICE MARNEA MOODY
Barbera, C.J. Greene Adkins McDonald Watts Hotten Getty,
JJ.
PER CURIAM ORDER
Filed: September 12, 2017 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * In the COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * Court of Appeals
v. * of Maryland
MAURICE MARNEA MOODY * Misc. Docket AG No. 38 September Term, 2016
For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it
is this 12th day of September 2017,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the
Respondent, Maurice Marnea Moody be, and he is hereby, disbarred,
effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State
of Maryland; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of
Maurice Marnea Moody from the register of attorneys, and pursuant
to Maryland Rule 19-761, shall certify that fact to the Trustees
of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals
in the State; and it is further
ORDERED that Respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the
Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant
to Maryland Rule 19-709, for which sum judgment is entered in favor
of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Maurice
Marnea Moody.
/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Moody, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-moody-md-2017.