Attorney Grievance v. McKenna
This text of 466 Md. 401 (Attorney Grievance v. McKenna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND
* v. * CHRISTOPHER BENEDICT MCKENNA Misc. Docket AG * No. 0028 September Term, 2019 *
ORDER
UPON CONSIDERATION of the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed by
the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Christopher
Benedict McKenna, and the record herein, it is this 20th day of November, 2019,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court
concurring, that the Respondent, Christopher Benedict McKenna, be, and he hereby is,
reprimanded for violating Rule 8.4(b) of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional
Conduct.
/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2019-11-20 15:06-05:00
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
466 Md. 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-mckenna-md-2019.