Attorney Grievance v. McGill

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedDecember 20, 2017
Docket51ag/17
StatusPublished

This text of Attorney Grievance v. McGill (Attorney Grievance v. McGill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. McGill, (Md. 2017).

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION IN THE OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Petitioner,

v. Misc. Docket AG No. 51 DAVID LESLIE MCGILL September Term, 2017

Respondent.

ORDER

The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having considered the Joint Petition of the

Attorney Grievance Commission and Respondent, David Leslie McGill, to place

Respondent on Inactive Status by Consent pursuant to Maryland Rules 19-736(c), it is this

20th day of December , 201 7 ;

ORDERED, that the Joint Petition be, and it is hereby GRANTED, and the

Respondent, David Leslie McGill, is hereby placed on Inactive Status by consent; and it is

further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of David Leslie

McGill from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client

Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State

in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.

/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Attorney Grievance v. McGill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-mcgill-md-2017.