Attorney Grievance v. McGill
This text of Attorney Grievance v. McGill (Attorney Grievance v. McGill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION IN THE OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Petitioner,
v. Misc. Docket AG No. 51 DAVID LESLIE MCGILL September Term, 2017
Respondent.
ORDER
The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having considered the Joint Petition of the
Attorney Grievance Commission and Respondent, David Leslie McGill, to place
Respondent on Inactive Status by Consent pursuant to Maryland Rules 19-736(c), it is this
20th day of December , 201 7 ;
ORDERED, that the Joint Petition be, and it is hereby GRANTED, and the
Respondent, David Leslie McGill, is hereby placed on Inactive Status by consent; and it is
further,
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of David Leslie
McGill from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client
Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State
in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.
/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. McGill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-mcgill-md-2017.