Attorney Grievance v. Lux
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Lux (Attorney Grievance v. Lux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE
OF MARYLAND
* COURT OF APPEALS Petitioner
* OF MARYLAND v.
* Misc. Docket AG No. 57 DAVID MICHAEL LUX * September Terrn, 2016 Respondent.
0 R D E R The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having considered the Joint Petition for
Placernent on Inactive Status by Consent, it is this 15th day of November, 2016;
ORDERED, that the Joint Petition be, and it is hereby GRANTED, and the Respondent, David Michael Lux, is hereby placed on lnactive Status by consent; and it is
further,
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of David Michael Lux from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in
accordance With Maryland Rule 19-761.
/s/ Clay_ton Greene Jr.
Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Lux, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-lux-md-2016.