Attorney Grievance v. Lovejoy
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * OF MARYLAND
v. * Misc. Docket AG No. 39, FREDERICK ARTHUR LOVEJOY * September Term, 2019
ORDER
UPON CONSIDERATION of the Amended Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland filed pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-737 and 19-721, the Show Cause Order, Petitioner’s Response to Show Cause Order, Respondent’s Response to Show Cause Order, and the record herein, it is this 23rd day of January, 2020,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Frederick Arthur Lovejoy, be and he hereby is, REPRIMANDED for violating Rules 3.4 (c) and 4.4 (a) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct.
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2020-01-23 14:38-05:00
/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk Chief Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
466 Md. 646 (Attorney Grievance v. Lovejoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.