Attorney Grievance v. Lovejoy
This text of 466 Md. 646 (Attorney Grievance v. Lovejoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * OF MARYLAND
v. * Misc. Docket AG No. 39,
FREDERICK ARTHUR LOVEJOY * September Term, 2019
ORDER
UPON CONSIDERATION of the Amended Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial
Action filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland filed pursuant to
Maryland Rule 19-737 and 19-721, the Show Cause Order, Petitioner’s Response to Show
Cause Order, Respondent’s Response to Show Cause Order, and the record herein, it is this
23rd day of January, 2020,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Frederick
Arthur Lovejoy, be and he hereby is, REPRIMANDED for violating Rules 3.4 (c) and 4.4
(a) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct.
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2020-01-23 14:38-05:00
/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk Chief Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
466 Md. 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-lovejoy-md-2020.