Attorney Grievance v. Lee
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Lee (Attorney Grievance v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND Petitioner,
v. * Misc. Docket AG N0. 77 ¥ * September Term, 2O 7 l
BO LEE *
Respondent.
This matter came before m the Court 0n the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent
filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission 0f Maryland and the Respondent, B0 Lee,
pursuant t0 Maryland Rule 19-736, in which the Respondent admits that he violated Rules
l9-301.15(a), 19-305.7, l9-308.1(b), 19-308.4(a) - (d) Ofthe Maryland Attomeys’ Rules
0f Professional Conduct. The Court, having considered the Petition, is it this g 18th day 0f
May , 2018,
ORDERED, that Respondent, B0 Lee, be and he hereby is disbarred from the
practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective immediately; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk 0f the Court shall remove the name Bo Lee from the
register ofattorneys in this Court, notify the Respondent in accordance with Maryland Rule
l9-742(a)(1), and comply with Maryland Rule 19-761.
/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-lee-md-2018.