Attorney Grievance v. Krame

288 A.3d 1230, 482 Md. 531
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided January 23, 2023·No. 32ago/21·Published

Opinion

*

IN THE

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT

*

OF MARYLAND

v. * Misc. AG Docket No. 32

EVAN J. KRAME * September Term, 2021

*

ORDER

On November 21, 2022, Bar Counsel filed the Notice of Final Disposition in the

District of Columbia and Request for Issuance of Show Cause Order. The Court issued a

show cause order requiring the respondent and Bar Counsel to show cause why reciprocal

discipline should not be imposed by the Supreme Court of Maryland. In their responses to

the order to show cause, the respondent and Bar Counsel both agree that reciprocal discipline

should be imposed, and that the respondent should be suspended nunc pro tunc to November

19, 2021, the date the respondent was temporarily suspended by this Court. Accordingly, it

is this 23rd day of January 2023, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that the Respondent, Evan J. Krame, is suspended from the practice of

law for an eighteen-month period commencing on November 19, 2021; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Evan J. Krame from

the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client

Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in

accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761(b). Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

2023-01-23 Chief Justice 15:29-05:00

Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance v. Krame, 288 A.3d 1230, 482 Md. 531 (Md. 2023).

288 A.3d 1230 (Attorney Grievance v. Krame) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.