Attorney Grievance v. Kilchenstein
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Kilchenstein (Attorney Grievance v. Kilchenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION IN THE OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Petitioner,
v. Misc. Docket AG No.- 67 GRACE BADOLATO KILCHENSTEIN September Term, 2017
Respondent.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent filed
herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, and Respondent's acknowledgment therein that
sufficient evidence exists to sustain allegations that she committed professional misconduct
in violation of Rules 1.15,5.3,5.5(a) and 8.4(a), (b), and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers'
Rules of Professional Conduct, in effect at the time of the misconduct, it is this 14th day
of March ,2018,
ORDERED, that the Respondent, Grace Badolato Kilchenstein, be and she is hereby
indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name Grace Badolato
Kilchenstein from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-761, shall
certiff that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and
all clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.
/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Kilchenstein, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-kilchenstein-md-2018.