Attorney Grievance v. Karger

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided December 21, 2014·No. 31ag/14·Published

Opinion

_' -=-=-:-z

I ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION

* IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 53 OF MARYLAND * 0F MARYLAND 2 * ii Petitioner, * Misc. Docket AG No.31 _ * September Term, 2014 V. * I * IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR

WILLIAM HARRY KARGER * MONTGOMERY COUNTY . * Respondent. *

_-k

- ‘W—_ ‘_ 5 _---.

- Consent of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent William H. Karger, H l; Esq., in which Petitioner and Respondent agreed that Respondent violated Rules 1.4, 5.5 and

. I. 8.4(a) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers‘ Rules of Professional Conduct, it is this 22nd day of

I December, 2014;

ORDERED, that Respondent be, and hereby is, reprimanded.

“figrfiglem silt ngr?:"'":" Senior Judge?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance v. Karger, (Md. 2014).

Attorney Grievance v. Karger (Attorney Grievance v. Karger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.