Attorney Grievance v. Karger

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedDecember 21, 2014
Docket31ag/14
StatusPublished

This text of Attorney Grievance v. Karger (Attorney Grievance v. Karger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. Karger, (Md. 2014).

Opinion

_' -=-=-:-z

I ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION

* IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 53 OF MARYLAND * 0F MARYLAND 2 * ii Petitioner, * Misc. Docket AG No.31 _ * September Term, 2014 V. * I * IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR

WILLIAM HARRY KARGER * MONTGOMERY COUNTY . * Respondent. *

_-k

- ‘W—_ ‘_ 5 _---.

- Consent of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent William H. Karger, H l; Esq., in which Petitioner and Respondent agreed that Respondent violated Rules 1.4, 5.5 and

. I. 8.4(a) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers‘ Rules of Professional Conduct, it is this 22nd day of

I December, 2014;

ORDERED, that Respondent be, and hereby is, reprimanded.

“figrfiglem silt ngr?:"'":" Senior Judge?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Attorney Grievance v. Karger, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-karger-md-2014.