Attorney Grievance v. Kang
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Kang (Attorney Grievance v. Kang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE In the COMMISSION OF MARYLAND Court of Appeals
of Maryland V. Misc. Docket AG No. 21,
SEUNG OH ICANG September Term, 2015
ORDER
The Court having considered the petition for disciplinary or remedial action filed
in the above entitled matter in accordance with Md. Rule 16-751(a)(2) and 16-773(b), the
response to the show cause order filed by Bar Counsel, and there being no response being
filed by Respondent it is this 19th day of October, 2015
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition be, and it is
hereby, granted, and Seung Oh Kang is disbarred, effective immediately, from the
practice of law in this State subject to further order of this Court; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall forthwith strike the name of Seung
Oh Kang from the register of attorneys in this Court and shall certify that fact to the
Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State
in accordance with Rule 16-760(e).
/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Kang, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-kang-md-2015.