Attorney Grievance v. Jones
This text of 267 A.3d 1118 (Attorney Grievance v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS
* OF MARYLAND v. * Misc. Docket AG No. 51
ANTOINI MARTIN JONES * September Term, 2021
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of
Maryland and the Respondent, Antoini Martin Jones, to suspend the Respondent from the
practice of law in Maryland for 60 days, stayed in favor of one year of probation with terms,
for violations of Rules 1.1, 1.5(a), 1.15(a) and (c), 1.16(d), and 8.4(a) and (d) of the Maryland
Rules of Professional Conduct, it is this 12th day of January, 2022
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Antoini Martin
Jones, be suspended for 60 days from the practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is
further
ORDERED, that, the suspension be, and hereby is, STAYED in favor of one year of
probation with the terms contained in the Probation Agreement.
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2022-01-12 10:47-05:00 /s/ Joseph M. Getty Chief Judge
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 A.3d 1118, 477 Md. 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-jones-md-2022.