Attorney Grievance v. Ingram

44 A.3d 424, 426 Md. 432
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMay 9, 2012
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 60, Sept. Term, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 44 A.3d 424 (Attorney Grievance v. Ingram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. Ingram, 44 A.3d 424, 426 Md. 432 (Md. 2012).

Opinion

44 A.3d 424 (2012)
426 Md. 432

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner
v.
Jesse H. INGRAM, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG No. 60, Sept. Term, 2011.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

May 9, 2012.

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Jesse H. Ingram, Esquire, to disbar the Respondent from the practice of law.

The Court having considered this Petition, it is this 9th day of May, 2012.

ORDERED, that Respondent, Jesse H. Ingram, be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland.

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Jesse H. Ingram from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ingram
44 A.3d 424 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 A.3d 424, 426 Md. 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-ingram-md-2012.