Attorney Grievance v. Hoerauf
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Hoerauf (Attorney Grievance v. Hoerauf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION* lN THE
OF MARYLAND * * COURT OF APPEALS Petitioner * * OF MARYLAND v. * * Misc. Docket AG GWYN CARA HOERAUF * No. 1 1 7 * September Term 2013 Respondent * * ORDER
This Court having considered the Joint Petition for Thirty-Day Suspensi0n by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 4th day of
June , 20l4,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Gwyn Cara Hoerauf be, and she hereby is, suspended by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for a period of thirty (3 0) days; and it is further
ORDERED, that the period of suspension shall commence thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this Order, and it is further
ORDERED, that the Respondent may apply for reinstatement after thirty (3 0) from the date this Order is entered, and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Gwyn Cara Hoerauf from the register of attorneys in this Court, and shall certify that fact to the Client Protection
Fund of Maryland and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State pursuant to Maryland Rule l6-772(d).
/s/ Glenn T. Harrel1, Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Hoerauf, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-hoerauf-md-2014.