Attorney Grievance v. Hecht
This text of 288 A.3d 1231 (Attorney Grievance v. Hecht) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * Misc. AG Docket No. 5 SPENCER MICHAEL HECHT * September Term, 2022 * ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed by the
Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, and Respondent, Spencer
Michael Hecht, in which the parties advise that the Respondent agrees that his conduct, as
described in the Joint Petition, violated Rule 19-303.4(c) (fairness to opposing party and
counsel) of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct and that the
Respondent consents to a reprimand as the appropriate sanction, it is this 24th day of
January 2023
ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that the Respondent, Spencer
Michael Hecht, is REPRIMANDED for violating Rule 19-303.4(c) of the Maryland
Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct.
/s/ Shirley M. Watts Senior Justice
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2023-01-24 12:19-05:00
Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
288 A.3d 1231, 482 Md. 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-hecht-md-2023.