Attorney Grievance v. Hecht

288 A.3d 1231, 482 Md. 533
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided January 24, 2023·No. 5ag/22·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * Misc. AG Docket No. 5 SPENCER MICHAEL HECHT * September Term, 2022 * ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed by the

Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, and Respondent, Spencer

Michael Hecht, in which the parties advise that the Respondent agrees that his conduct, as

described in the Joint Petition, violated Rule 19-303.4(c) (fairness to opposing party and

counsel) of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct and that the

Respondent consents to a reprimand as the appropriate sanction, it is this 24th day of

January 2023

ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that the Respondent, Spencer

Michael Hecht, is REPRIMANDED for violating Rule 19-303.4(c) of the Maryland

Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct.

/s/ Shirley M. Watts Senior Justice

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2023-01-24 12:19-05:00

Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance v. Hecht, 288 A.3d 1231, 482 Md. 533 (Md. 2023).

288 A.3d 1231 (Attorney Grievance v. Hecht) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oglesby v. Baltimore School Associates
484 Md. 296 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2023)
Smith v. State
296 A.3d 1032 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2023)