Attorney Grievance v. Hausmann
This text of 280 A.3d 652 (Attorney Grievance v. Hausmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS
* OF MARYLAND v. * Misc. Docket AG No. 99
WENDY A. HAUSMANN * September Term, 2021
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand filed by the Attorney
Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Wendy A. Hausmann, it is this 10th
day of August, 2022
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Wendy A.
Hausmann, be, and she hereby is, REPRIMANDED for violating Rules 4-1.2(c), 4-1.7(b), 4-
1.8(a), 4-1.9(a), and 4-8.4(d) of the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Judge
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2022-08-10 15:18-04:00
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
280 A.3d 652, 480 Md. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-hausmann-md-2022.