Attorney Grievance v. Hausmann

280 A.3d 652, 480 Md. 200
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided August 10, 2022·No. 99ag/21·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS

* OF MARYLAND

v.

* Misc. Docket AG No. 99

WENDY A. HAUSMANN * September Term, 2021

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Wendy A. Hausmann, it is this 10th day of August, 2022

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Wendy A.

Hausmann, be, and she hereby is, REPRIMANDED for violating Rules 4-1.2(c), 4-1.7(b), 4- 1.8(a), 4-1.9(a), and 4-8.4(d) of the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

Chief Judge

Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2022-08-10 15:18-04:00

Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance v. Hausmann, 280 A.3d 652, 480 Md. 200 (Md. 2022).

280 A.3d 652 (Attorney Grievance v. Hausmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.