Attorney Grievance v. Harris
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Harris (Attorney Grievance v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION • IN THE OF MARYLAND • COURT OF APPEALS • OF MARYLAND Petitioner ID1o2cket AG v. • No. 112_ • September Term, 2016 ROGER LEE HARRIS, JR.
Respondent
ORDER Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant
to Maryland Rule 19-736, and Respondent's acknowledgment therein that sufficient evidence
exists to sustain allegations that he committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1,
1.2(a), 1.3, 1.4(a)(2)-(3), 1.15(a) and (d), 8.4(a), (b), (c), and (d)of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules
of Professional Conduct, in effect prior to July 1,2016, current Maryland Rule 19-308.1(6), as
well as Maryland Business Occupations and Professions Code Ann. § 10-304 and § 10-306, it is
this 25th day of May 2017,
ORDERED, that Respondent, Roger Lee Harris, Jr., be and he is hereby disbarred from
the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective immediately; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Roger Lee Harris, Jr.
from the register of attorneys in the Court, notify Respondent of such action, and comply with
the notice provisions set forth in Maryland Rule 19-76I(b).
/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Harris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-harris-md-2017.