Attorney Grievance v. Harmon
This text of 279 A.3d 405 (Attorney Grievance v. Harmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS
* OF MARYLAND v. * Misc. Docket AG No. 7
JEWEL M. HARMON * September Term, 2022
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of
Maryland and the Respondent, Jewel M. Harmon, to suspend the Respondent from the practice
of law in Maryland for 60 days, stayed in favor of one year of probation with terms, it is this
22nd day of July, 2022
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Jewel M.
Harmon, be suspended for 60 days for violation of Rules 1.1(b), 1.3(c), 1.16(a) and 8.4(d) of
the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further
ORDERED, that, the suspension be, and hereby is, STAYED in favor of one year of
probation with the terms contained in the Probation Agreement.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Judge Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2022-07-22 11:41-04:00
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 A.3d 405, 479 Md. 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-harmon-md-2022.