Attorney Grievance v. Haar
This text of 273 A.3d 888 (Attorney Grievance v. Haar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS
* OF MARYLAND v. * Misc. Docket AG No. 83
PAUL SAUL HAAR * September Term, 2021
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of
Maryland and the Respondent, Paul Saul Haar, to suspend the Respondent from the practice
of law in Maryland for seven months, effective nunc pro tunc to March 24, 2022, followed by
one year of probation with terms, it is this 22nd day of April, 2022
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Paul Saul
Haar, be suspended for seven months, effective nunc pro tunc to March 24, 2022, for violation
of Rule 1.15(e) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further
ORDERED, that upon his reinstatement to practice of law in the State of Maryland,
the Respondent is placed on one year of probation with the terms contained in the Probation
Agreement.
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader 2022-04-22 12:37-04:00 Chief Judge
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 A.3d 888, 478 Md. 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-haar-md-2022.