Attorney Grievance v. Gray

25 A.3d 219, 421 Md. 92
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJuly 19, 2011
DocketMisc. Docket AG Nos. 39, Sept. Term, 2010, 3, Sept. Term, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 25 A.3d 219 (Attorney Grievance v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. Gray, 25 A.3d 219, 421 Md. 92 (Md. 2011).

Opinion

25 A.3d 219 (2011)
421 Md. 92

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner
v.
Melissa D. GRAY, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG Nos. 39, Sept. Term, 2010, 3, Sept. Term, 2011.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

July 19, 2011.

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Amended Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent submitted by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and Melissa D. Gray, Respondent. The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 19th day of July, 2011

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, Melissa D. Gray, be, and she is hereby reprimanded for her violation of Rules 1.3, 1.4, and 8.1(b) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Gray
83 A.3d 786 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2014)
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Subin
25 A.3d 219 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 A.3d 219, 421 Md. 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-gray-md-2011.