Attorney Grievance v. Gonzalez y Torres
This text of 286 A.3d 1112 (Attorney Grievance v. Gonzalez y Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * SUPREME COURT COMMISSION * OF MARYLAND v. * AG Docket No.10 EDUARDO VIDÁL GONZÁLEZ y September Term, 2022 * TORRES Case No. C-22-CV-22-000257 * Circuit Court for Wicomico County
ORDER
The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Eduardo Vidál
González y Torres, have jointly petitioned the Court to suspend the Respondent from the
practice of law in Maryland for 60 days for violations of 8 C.F.R. § 1003.102(c) (o), (q)(2)
and (3), and (r)(2), but with the execution of that disposition stayed for a 12-month period of
probation subject to the terms and conditions of the parties’ probation agreement. Upon
consideration of the joint petition, it is this 16th day of December 2022, by the Supreme Court
of Maryland,
ORDERED that the Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for 60 days; and
it is further
ORDERED that the execution of the suspension is STAYED for twelve months subject
to respondent’s compliance with the terms and conditions of his probation agreement.
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2022-12-16 08:17-05:00 /s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice
Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 A.3d 1112, 482 Md. 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-gonzalez-y-torres-md-2022.