Attorney Grievance v. Gonzalez y Torres

286 A.3d 1112, 482 Md. 341
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided December 16, 2022·No. 10ag/22·Published

Opinion

* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * SUPREME COURT COMMISSION * OF MARYLAND v. * AG Docket No.10 EDUARDO VIDÁL GONZÁLEZ y September Term, 2022 * TORRES Case No. C-22-CV-22-000257 * Circuit Court for Wicomico County

ORDER

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Eduardo Vidál

González y Torres, have jointly petitioned the Court to suspend the Respondent from the

practice of law in Maryland for 60 days for violations of 8 C.F.R. § 1003.102(c) (o), (q)(2)

and (3), and (r)(2), but with the execution of that disposition stayed for a 12-month period of

probation subject to the terms and conditions of the parties’ probation agreement. Upon

consideration of the joint petition, it is this 16th day of December 2022, by the Supreme Court

of Maryland,

ORDERED that the Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for 60 days; and

it is further

ORDERED that the execution of the suspension is STAYED for twelve months subject

to respondent’s compliance with the terms and conditions of his probation agreement.

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2022-12-16 08:17-05:00 /s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice

Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance v. Gonzalez y Torres, 286 A.3d 1112, 482 Md. 341 (Md. 2022).

286 A.3d 1112 (Attorney Grievance v. Gonzalez y Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 1003.102 — Grounds.
8 C.F.R. § 1003.102(c)(o)