Attorney Grievance v. Glick
This text of 472 Md. 559 (Attorney Grievance v. Glick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS
* OF MARYLAND v. * Misc. Docket AG No. 16 September Term, 2020 JONATHAN STEVEN RESNICK, * PERRY ANDREW RESNICK, and (No. C-03-CV-20-002490, LOUIS J. GLICK * Circuit Court for Baltimore County)
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed by the
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Louis J. Glick, pursuant to
Maryland Rule 19-736, in the above-captioned case, it is this 18th day of March, 2021
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Louis J. Glick,
be, and he hereby is, reprimanded for violating Maryland Rules 19-308.4(a) (misconduct) and
19-410(a) (prohibited transactions); and it is further
ORDERED, that the above-captioned case is hereby concluded as to all Respondents,
dispositive action having previously been taken as to Jonathan Steven Resnick and Perry
Andrew Resnick.
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. /s/ Robert N. McDonald Senior Judge
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk 2021-03-18 13:33-04:00
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
472 Md. 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-glick-md-2021.