Attorney Grievance v. Glick

472 Md. 559
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided March 18, 2021·No. 16agc/20·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND

* COURT OF APPEALS

* OF MARYLAND

v.

* Misc. Docket AG No. 16 September Term, 2020

JONATHAN STEVEN RESNICK, * PERRY ANDREW RESNICK, and (No. C-03-CV-20-002490, LOUIS J. GLICK * Circuit Court for Baltimore County)

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed by the

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Louis J. Glick, pursuant to

Maryland Rule 19-736, in the above-captioned case, it is this 18th day of March, 2021

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Louis J. Glick,

be, and he hereby is, reprimanded for violating Maryland Rules 19-308.4(a) (misconduct) and

19-410(a) (prohibited transactions); and it is further

ORDERED, that the above-captioned case is hereby concluded as to all Respondents,

dispositive action having previously been taken as to Jonathan Steven Resnick and Perry

Andrew Resnick.

Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. /s/ Robert N. McDonald Senior Judge

Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk 2021-03-18 13:33-04:00

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance v. Glick, 472 Md. 559 (Md. 2021).

472 Md. 559 (Attorney Grievance v. Glick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.